<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three For Friday</title>
	<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2005/11/25/three-for-friday/</link>
	<description>A Fantasy Basketball Blog. Surprise.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: bv</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2005/11/25/three-for-friday/#comment-328</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2005/11/25/three-for-friday/#comment-328</guid>
					<description>I don't know that I would consider Posey a buy-low guy right now.  I mean, what about him is "low"?  He's the 4th-ish option on his team, and that's only going to get worse once Shaq comes back.  He's hitting more three's right now than ever before so that should likely come down ... sure his steals should improve but you can't start a guy just because he gets a steal and a half per game.  He'll be on and off the waiver wire all year, as will villanueva and duhon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know that I would consider Posey a buy-low guy right now.  I mean, what about him is &#8220;low&#8221;?  He&#8217;s the 4th-ish option on his team, and that&#8217;s only going to get worse once Shaq comes back.  He&#8217;s hitting more three&#8217;s right now than ever before so that should likely come down &#8230; sure his steals should improve but you can&#8217;t start a guy just because he gets a steal and a half per game.  He&#8217;ll be on and off the waiver wire all year, as will villanueva and duhon.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2005/11/25/three-for-friday/#comment-327</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2005/11/25/three-for-friday/#comment-327</guid>
					<description>when it comes to Posey, is he a good buy low candidate right now?  Would you take him over guys like Villanueva and Chris Duhon, who are on and off the waiver wires these days?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when it comes to Posey, is he a good buy low candidate right now?  Would you take him over guys like Villanueva and Chris Duhon, who are on and off the waiver wires these days?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: bublitchki</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2005/11/25/three-for-friday/#comment-326</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2005/11/25/three-for-friday/#comment-326</guid>
					<description>What does "buy fake high" mean? I missed your earlier explanation on that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does &#8220;buy fake high&#8221; mean? I missed your earlier explanation on that one.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DM</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2005/11/25/three-for-friday/#comment-325</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2005/11/25/three-for-friday/#comment-325</guid>
					<description>I watched Gerald Wallace run wild on the Wizards last night. The dude is all over the court. On one blocked shot he leaped a foot over the rim and caught the ball and headed back down court. He's locked in a serious groove right now. I mean, 26 and 14 with 3 steals, 5 blocks and a 3? He might actually be a good "buy fake high" guy right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched Gerald Wallace run wild on the Wizards last night. The dude is all over the court. On one blocked shot he leaped a foot over the rim and caught the ball and headed back down court. He&#8217;s locked in a serious groove right now. I mean, 26 and 14 with 3 steals, 5 blocks and a 3? He might actually be a good &#8220;buy fake high&#8221; guy right now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: bublitchki</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2005/11/25/three-for-friday/#comment-324</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 09:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2005/11/25/three-for-friday/#comment-324</guid>
					<description>Hey, thanks for posting your takes on those three players! You definitely helped clarify some of the mystery for me, at least regarding two of them. 

Your takes on Wallace and Daniels were very interesting and show why your site is one of the best fantasy hoops sites around. The insights you offered went beyond the kind of conventional crap one usually finds peddled on most of the so-called "expert" sites - y'know the ones where they charge you $19.95 to tip you off to some sleeper that some guy picked up off your waiver wire a week ago.

I was intrigued by your "failed sleeper" explanation of Wallace's breakout this year. In a crazy kind of way, it does make sense. Just about everyone I know was on dude's bandwagon going into last year due to his move from Sacto benchwarmer to starter for an expansion club. Well, it's pretty obvious that he wasn't ready to be da man last year, but that he's much more comfortable in that role this year. I'm sure this also applies to several other "failed sleepers" who needed at least a season to acclimate to a new situation that was supposed to have benefited them immediately. I think the "failed sleeper" concept is worthy of further examination and probably warrants a whole separate post of its own.

I also was very interested in your explanation of Daniels' mediocrity thus far. The idea that his problems stem from being, at best, the fourth offensive option on his team is a fascinating one. As someone who tends to downgrade scoring (because it tends to be so overvalued) I have never really considered where a player ranks in a team's offensive pecking order. Yet, when you think about it seems plausible that being out of the main flow of the offense would hurt more than just a player's scoring numbers. This idea, too, seems like it would be worth a more in-depth examination in another, separate post.

Bonzi, however, remains a complete mystery to me. I live in Portland and must have seen over a hundred of the guy's games and... well, I can't believe I'm watching the same player. The only possible explanation I can think of is that Sacramento this year is the NBA's version of the bizarro world in which the teams' shooting guard averages more rebounds than it's center; in which its center averages more assists than its point guard; and in which its point guard chucks the ball more freely than its shooting guard -the once notoriously selfish Bonzi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for posting your takes on those three players! You definitely helped clarify some of the mystery for me, at least regarding two of them. </p>
<p>Your takes on Wallace and Daniels were very interesting and show why your site is one of the best fantasy hoops sites around. The insights you offered went beyond the kind of conventional crap one usually finds peddled on most of the so-called &#8220;expert&#8221; sites - y&#8217;know the ones where they charge you $19.95 to tip you off to some sleeper that some guy picked up off your waiver wire a week ago.</p>
<p>I was intrigued by your &#8220;failed sleeper&#8221; explanation of Wallace&#8217;s breakout this year. In a crazy kind of way, it does make sense. Just about everyone I know was on dude&#8217;s bandwagon going into last year due to his move from Sacto benchwarmer to starter for an expansion club. Well, it&#8217;s pretty obvious that he wasn&#8217;t ready to be da man last year, but that he&#8217;s much more comfortable in that role this year. I&#8217;m sure this also applies to several other &#8220;failed sleepers&#8221; who needed at least a season to acclimate to a new situation that was supposed to have benefited them immediately. I think the &#8220;failed sleeper&#8221; concept is worthy of further examination and probably warrants a whole separate post of its own.</p>
<p>I also was very interested in your explanation of Daniels&#8217; mediocrity thus far. The idea that his problems stem from being, at best, the fourth offensive option on his team is a fascinating one. As someone who tends to downgrade scoring (because it tends to be so overvalued) I have never really considered where a player ranks in a team&#8217;s offensive pecking order. Yet, when you think about it seems plausible that being out of the main flow of the offense would hurt more than just a player&#8217;s scoring numbers. This idea, too, seems like it would be worth a more in-depth examination in another, separate post.</p>
<p>Bonzi, however, remains a complete mystery to me. I live in Portland and must have seen over a hundred of the guy&#8217;s games and&#8230; well, I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m watching the same player. The only possible explanation I can think of is that Sacramento this year is the NBA&#8217;s version of the bizarro world in which the teams&#8217; shooting guard averages more rebounds than it&#8217;s center; in which its center averages more assists than its point guard; and in which its point guard chucks the ball more freely than its shooting guard -the once notoriously selfish Bonzi.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DM</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2005/11/25/three-for-friday/#comment-323</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 00:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2005/11/25/three-for-friday/#comment-323</guid>
					<description>Tough call ... I'm still holding hope for Korver, though. Before he got into foul trouble last game, he had jacked up at least 5 3s in each of his previous five games. And he's shooting 40% on the season from downtown, so it's not like his stroke is off. And there's always the chance that AI or Webber will go down, meaning he'd have a much bigger role. 

I've always liked Posey, but his absolute lack of steals this season is perplexing. Can't go wrong with the 3s so far, but he's a career 33% shooter lighting it up at 50%. Can't see that holding up. He's seeing big minutes right now, though, and is certainly worth playing even though 3s is all he's helping in. 

I'd probably stick with Korver, although it's pretty close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tough call &#8230; I&#8217;m still holding hope for Korver, though. Before he got into foul trouble last game, he had jacked up at least 5 3s in each of his previous five games. And he&#8217;s shooting 40% on the season from downtown, so it&#8217;s not like his stroke is off. And there&#8217;s always the chance that AI or Webber will go down, meaning he&#8217;d have a much bigger role. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always liked Posey, but his absolute lack of steals this season is perplexing. Can&#8217;t go wrong with the 3s so far, but he&#8217;s a career 33% shooter lighting it up at 50%. Can&#8217;t see that holding up. He&#8217;s seeing big minutes right now, though, and is certainly worth playing even though 3s is all he&#8217;s helping in. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d probably stick with Korver, although it&#8217;s pretty close.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rook</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2005/11/25/three-for-friday/#comment-322</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2005/11/25/three-for-friday/#comment-322</guid>
					<description>I'm curious also to hear your thoughts on a topic you've posted briefly about earlier this season: Kyle Korver.  With Webber around, he's taking 2.5 fewer 3s per game than last year.  He got posts steals and reasonably low turnovers, obviously 90% of his value is in his 3s.  Should we expect a rebound, or is he too buried in the Sixers offense?  Is Posey, who has been chucking up a ton of 3s, but who isn't stealing the ball and may have a lot of competition for minutes, a better fantasy play?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious also to hear your thoughts on a topic you&#8217;ve posted briefly about earlier this season: Kyle Korver.  With Webber around, he&#8217;s taking 2.5 fewer 3s per game than last year.  He got posts steals and reasonably low turnovers, obviously 90% of his value is in his 3s.  Should we expect a rebound, or is he too buried in the Sixers offense?  Is Posey, who has been chucking up a ton of 3s, but who isn&#8217;t stealing the ball and may have a lot of competition for minutes, a better fantasy play?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
