<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Team Preview: Atlanta Hawks</title>
	<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/09/13/team-preview-atlanta-hawks/</link>
	<description>A Fantasy Basketball Blog. Surprise.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: thfnwwfxlb</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/09/13/team-preview-atlanta-hawks/#comment-11733</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/09/13/team-preview-atlanta-hawks/#comment-11733</guid>
					<description>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! dommzsfqgogdp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! dommzsfqgogdp
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: give me the rock &#187; Fantasy Preview: Atlanta Hawks</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/09/13/team-preview-atlanta-hawks/#comment-1117</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/09/13/team-preview-atlanta-hawks/#comment-1117</guid>
					<description>[...] Finally, Fantasy Basketblog has their Atlanta Hawks preview up. If you don’t like any of my recommendations… well, sadly, we agree on most everything, so I guess I’m right. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Finally, Fantasy Basketblog has their Atlanta Hawks preview up. If you don’t like any of my recommendations… well, sadly, we agree on most everything, so I guess I’m right. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/09/13/team-preview-atlanta-hawks/#comment-1086</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/09/13/team-preview-atlanta-hawks/#comment-1086</guid>
					<description>Great team previews.

The only thing I've disagreed with so far is saying that Josh Childress had no fantasy value last year. As a Childress owner, I feel the need to defend him, or at least clarify his value.

In 8-cat leagues, he only rated at #84 on the player rater.  However, if you're in a 9-cat league (with turnovers) than he came in at #63 on the player rater...early 7th round value. For context, 3 players right ahead of him on the player rater (per game stats): Mike Miller, Turkoglu, Hinrich, The 3 players right below him: Josh Smith, B.Simmons, Josh Howard.

One other odd thing of note... He played much better when he was the 6th man. He had a VERY slow start to the season as a starter (first 9 games). But then he went to the bench and nearly all his numbers improved: minutes, points, stls, blks, FG%, FT%, 3's, TO, etc. 

A weird guy to own, but definitely not without value. I'm hoping he stays as the 6th man and continues to get his 30+ minutes/game. With Harrington out of the way, I think he's got a good shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great team previews.</p>
<p>The only thing I&#8217;ve disagreed with so far is saying that Josh Childress had no fantasy value last year. As a Childress owner, I feel the need to defend him, or at least clarify his value.</p>
<p>In 8-cat leagues, he only rated at #84 on the player rater.  However, if you&#8217;re in a 9-cat league (with turnovers) than he came in at #63 on the player rater&#8230;early 7th round value. For context, 3 players right ahead of him on the player rater (per game stats): Mike Miller, Turkoglu, Hinrich, The 3 players right below him: Josh Smith, B.Simmons, Josh Howard.</p>
<p>One other odd thing of note&#8230; He played much better when he was the 6th man. He had a VERY slow start to the season as a starter (first 9 games). But then he went to the bench and nearly all his numbers improved: minutes, points, stls, blks, FG%, FT%, 3&#8217;s, TO, etc. </p>
<p>A weird guy to own, but definitely not without value. I&#8217;m hoping he stays as the 6th man and continues to get his 30+ minutes/game. With Harrington out of the way, I think he&#8217;s got a good shot.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
