<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Team Preview: Dallas Mavericks</title>
	<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/09/14/team-preview-dallas-mavericks/</link>
	<description>A Fantasy Basketball Blog. Surprise.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Rook</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/09/14/team-preview-dallas-mavericks/#comment-1096</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 18:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/09/14/team-preview-dallas-mavericks/#comment-1096</guid>
					<description>Just like JM pointed out with regard to Childress, Josh Howard becomes a lot more valuable with turnovers included -- #67 on the average player rater last year (though way down to #94 cumulative).  He's one of those weird players whose most "valuable" category is turnovers... making him plenty valuable if you drafted Arenas or Nash early.    The injuries, though, are a big concern.  Not sure what kind of injuries he's had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like JM pointed out with regard to Childress, Josh Howard becomes a lot more valuable with turnovers included &#8212; #67 on the average player rater last year (though way down to #94 cumulative).  He&#8217;s one of those weird players whose most &#8220;valuable&#8221; category is turnovers&#8230; making him plenty valuable if you drafted Arenas or Nash early.    The injuries, though, are a big concern.  Not sure what kind of injuries he&#8217;s had.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kimbal</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/09/14/team-preview-dallas-mavericks/#comment-1094</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 06:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/09/14/team-preview-dallas-mavericks/#comment-1094</guid>
					<description>Nice job on this.  I am enjoying your previews, refreshing to read something like this well before the season starts!

I think you miss the point on Stackhouse, because you must be in a very deep league to draft him at all other than for the end of your bench and, if so, you are more concerned about whether he hurts you badly in any area rather than where he helps you.  Jerry only hurts you in FG % and perhaps rebounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job on this.  I am enjoying your previews, refreshing to read something like this well before the season starts!</p>
<p>I think you miss the point on Stackhouse, because you must be in a very deep league to draft him at all other than for the end of your bench and, if so, you are more concerned about whether he hurts you badly in any area rather than where he helps you.  Jerry only hurts you in FG % and perhaps rebounds.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
