check outcheck out The On Deck Circle - The Unofficial Home of Real TalkThe On Deck Circle - The Unofficial Home of Real Talk
SportsBlogNet - Your last stop for everything sports-relateda part of Sports Blog Net
 

Team Preview: Milwaukee Bucks

The Bucks tried their best to slip out of the Eastern Conference playoffs last year, and nearly pulled it off, losing 6 of their last 9 games and finishing at 40-42.  They were the only sub-.500 team in the playoffs, didn’t belong, and graciously bowed out to the Pistons in five games.  This year, they’ve got plenty of reason for hope.  Their retooled roster features a front line that consists of arguably the two best non-CP3 rookies of last year.  They’ve got one of the best pure shooters in the game, and they’ve got a nice cast of role players to fill out the roster.  And, of course, they’ve got FBB favorite Steve Blake, which is never a bad thing.  Ever.  Let’s get on with it:

The Stud: Michael Redd, GF
Redd just keeps on impressing.  Last year he again improved his ppg, which he’s done every single season so far.  He also set a career-high in FT%, and tied a career-high in steals.  He was a spectacular 18/22 on the total/average player rater, played in 80 games, saw 39 minutes, and was everything his owners could have possibly hoped for.  Still, for some reason I’m not convinced he’s a second round pick, and I’m not sure exactly why.  I just look at all the categories that he won’t help in – FG%, boards, assists, and blocks – that’s a lot of weaknesses for your second-best player.  I also am skeptical that he will continue to improve – I’d actually be surprised if he matches all of his numbers from last year, particularly his steals and his threes.  I will say that I was pretty surprised to see Redd as a GF this year, I always thought he was a pure SG, so that bumps up his value a little just because of roster flexibility.  But I can’t advocate playing a guy who gets under 5 boards and virtually no blocks as a forward.  Redd is a top SG though, for sure, and is a great third-round selection.

The Support: Charlie Villanueva, F
Fantasy owners had a love-hate relationship with Villanueva last year.  He started off strong, with 11/6 and strong supplementary stats in November, but then saw his minutes and overall numbers decline over the next two months.  After the All-Star break, though, he was terrific.  He took advantage of being on a decimated Raptors roster and saw 35 mpg, putting up 14/8 with 1.1 threes, .8 steals and .8 blocks, and basically helping out everywhere.  The end result looked pretty good, but the problem with Villanueva was he was so off-and-on.  For example, his 48-point effort against these very Milwaukee Bucks in March was preceded by two 6-point games, and he was likely on a lot of benches when he exploded.  Some of this might be explained by the fact that he had to play for Sam Mitchell – some of it might be explained simply by the fact that he was a rookie.  Regardless, he’ll be counted on to be the starting PF on the Bucks for the present and the future, and should see at least 30 mpg in this role.  Owners will have to hope he shows some consistency, but he’s a fine mid-late round pick this year.

The Supporting Support: Bobby Simmons, GF
I was already to talk about what a terrible year Simmons had, but you know something?  It really wasn’t too bad after all.  He really struggled with both his game and his health early on, but picked it up after the new year and ended up with respectable if disappointing overall numbers.  He saw drops just about across the board except for in one area – three pointers.  All of a sudden Simmons doubled his output behind the arc to 1.5 3’s per game, and that’s a huge bonus if he keeps it up.  I’d look for Simmons – who is pretty much the only 3 on the team right now – to see at least 35 mpg, and return to his high expectations set with the Clippers two years ago, and actually exceed them if he keeps shooting threes.  He is actually a great value if you can get him in the middle rounds, which you should be able to do.

The Sleeper: Mo Williams, PG
Let’s do a Player A/Player B with two point guards:

Player A: 17.1/3.8 with 2.1 threes and 1.3 steals, 47/80 percentages, 35mpg.
Player B: 14.7/4.2 with 1.5 threes and 1.1 steals, 45/85 percentages, 29.7 mpg.

Pretty similar, right?  The first one is Jason Terry, who is likely going to be taken in the 4th round or so in your draft.  The second is Williams before he hurt his ankle last year.  He’ll be available well after the fourth round.  One of the big concerns for Williams is supposedly going to be his playing time, but I’m not buying it.  Listen, as much as we like Steve Blake, he is just not going to see the same minutes that TJ Ford saw last year.  And Charlie Bell is a nice guy but he’s also going to be backing up Michael Redd at the 2.  Williams has been promised the starting gig and should see close to 35 mpg.  Keep an eye on how things develop in camp, but as long as he holds on to that spot, he’s a fantastic sleeper this year.

The Slacker: Andrew Bogut, C
Here’s the problem with Bogut – I’m just not convinced he’s ready to make the leap this year.  He’s no better than a third or fourth option on offense at best, and he doesn’t do enough outside of that to warrant a high pick.  Let’s say he sees maybe 5 or 6 more mpg this year, up to 34 or so.  And let’s give him the benefit of the doubt that he’ll do some improving on his per-minute averages as well.  Let’s say he gets maybe a 25% bump on all his stats across the board.  That puts him around 12.5 points, 9 boards, 1 block, .8 steals.  Is that really all that good?  It’s kinda like Chris Kaman last year, only with fewer blocks (and a much worse FT%).  Bogut is worth drafting for sure, and will have his moments, but I don’t think he’s anywhere near a C1 yet.

Double Dribbles: Ruben Patterson will be a solid reserve and should something happen to the starting wingmen he should have value if only for his steals, but he’s not draftable at this point … Blake will need 35 mpg in order to have any value.  Williams does have a history of injuries, so it’s not out of the realm of possibilities, but again, he’s not draftable … Dan Gadzuric had a down year last year, but he’s still carved out a nice role for himself as a shot-blocking backup center.  He doesn’t belong on a roster though … Brian Skinner and Ha-Seung Jin had no value last year backing up Theo Ratliff and Joel Przybilla, so there’s not reason to think they’ll have value backing up Bogut and Gadzuric … I’m not sure where exactly Charlie Bell came from or why people think he’ll take minutes away from Mo Williams this year.  He’s an 11th man on this team and nothing more, in all likelihood.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

5 Responses to “Team Preview: Milwaukee Bucks”

  1. Terrance Says:

    Im with you on redd. there are too many multi cat players available in round two to take a SG. He is SF eliegible so that helps a little.

    Im loving mo williams this year, charlie bell had a quick flash in the pan last season, but that isnt enough to take that many minutes from williams. Last season mo williams was a good pg3 thru the first 20-30 games with tj ford in the picture. he has no name recognition and should be avail in round 11-12. to me, that makes him one of the bigger sleepers that could pay off in the late rounds. the minutes are mo’s to lose

  2. JM Says:

    I think Redd’s value is late 2nd round, but can see both BVs and Terrance’s points about him not contributing in enough categories to be a 2nd round pick. (Also, there’s the logic that you can wait until the third round to take him, since he’ll still be available then (similar to the perennially underrated Rashard Lewis).

    Terrance, you mentioned that there’s too many multi-cat players availabe in late 2nd round to take Redd…but I’m wondering who you had in mind who would help you in more than 5 categories (Redd helps in Pts,3’s,Stls,FT% (a lot), TOs)

    If you look at guys who Yahoo has rated 18-24 (a proxy of who might be available in the late 2nd round of your draft) the ones that stick out are

    V.Carter
    Kirilenko
    Billups
    Kidd

    Are those the folks you had in mind? or are there others?

  3. terrance Says:

    yeah, kiri, billups, and kidd are three…i just feel that redd might have maxed out last season.

    to me, there are some players that still have potential or IF they stay healthy can be huge. and i think you know who im talking about:). more about that in a second.

    players id take ahead of redd include:

    the three mentioned above, but to be fair, those three should be gone well before redd.

    i dont like vince carter at all, and would avoid him at all cost, just a personal preference. but id hold out and take redd instead of carter a round later if you happen to be in a snake draft and have an early pick (top 4). redd is comparable to carter and gets to the line as many time/game, but has better %’s.

    joe johnson:

    has a pretty bland game, but its a 5 cat game and is one of two slashing SG who qualify @ PG and get get 6+ assists/game…(the other is wade) if he got his FG % up 2%, hed be my poor mans dwayne wade….dont laugh, johnson is wade minus the blocks and plus the 3’s and his FG % wont help or hurt you.

    and yes, if you want to throw hinrich in as a PG /SG who gets 6+assists/game, you can…but hes not on the formers level, so i wont bother.

    Gerald Wallace:

    remember earlier when i said IF? This is who i was talking about, but im sure you knew that. a player that can give you in 65 games what most wont give you in 82, and he gets the hard stats. points and reb can be had late in teh draft. but steals and blocks are hard to come by. you can get this guy with 50+% from the field and if yr lucky….youll get the same from the FT line, which is the only reason id pass on him.

    Boris Diaw: jack of all trades, master of none

    now, theres no way id take diaw over redd. but yr talking multi cats here. im not sold on him however…arguably 6 cat, more likely 5 cat…those .7 stls dont fly with me…about avg. hes rated higher on yahoo than redd, but again, i dont buy it…but it yr looking at multi cats, hes another guy.

    and finally, cos im tired and i dont want to type anymore

    Brad Miller.

    Hes C eligible and meat and potatos. been pretty reliable seeing 72-56-79 in the past 3 seasons. From what i read is being encouraged to step outside and at least attempt more 3s…now me…ill take this return over diaw for sure, 38% from behind the arc last season…FOR A CENTER?!? the scarcest position in fantasy basketball and hes a 5 cat contributor for sure 7 cat if you count .8 stl and blk/gme….but he wont hurt you in stl and blcks.

  4. terrance Says:

    in that Brad Miller section i meant redd in stead of diaw…sorry :)

    “ill take this return over redd for sure”

  5. David Jensen Says:

    As per your comments on Bogut… This year they will use him like the Kings did Divac or Webber. He will be probably be one of the best NBA bigs at dimes this season.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.