The Replacements

We’re just over a week into the season and the injuries are starting to pile up. Plenty of players who are owned in almost all leagues have missed games over the past few days; some of these are long-term, some short-tern, some unknown. Where there’s injury there’s opportunity, but it’s not always the same type of opportunity. Let’s take a look at some of the different types of situations that arise when a player goes down and some recent examples. If you can identify what type it’s going to be when an injury hits, it can help you quickly decide whether to make any roster moves.

Marginal to Certain
Last night showed two fine examples of players that already had decent roles on their teams, but really came through when seeing some extra time. In New York, Steve Francis’s ankle injury opened the door for Jamal Crawford to enter the starting lineup. Crawford had been ice cold to start the season (10-for-47, 21%) but had still played at least 27 minutes in three of four games. He’s always been a terrible shooter, but that hasn’t stopped him from having plenty of value when getting the minutes. Last night he certainly got the minutes, and put up one of the best lines of the year so far with 35/6/7 with 4 3s and 2 steals (and 7 turnovers) in 43 minutes. Crawford was on the verge of having value before last night; if he kept getting around 30 minutes, he was going to start putting up some numbers. But as long as Francis is out, Crawford goes from being a shaky option to a sure thing. Not all games will be like last night, of course, but Crawford is the type of player who thrives with consistent minutes. He was out of the starting lineup for much of last year but still put up some decent number, but remember what happened when he started the last 11 games in April?

Ryan Gomes hadn’t been able to build on his second-half breakout from last season despite starting two of the Celtics first three games and seeing 30 minutes in the other. He was on fantasy radars because he was one of those players who had proven he could produce and was in that 25-30 minute netherworld. But with Al Jefferson out for at least 3 weeks after an appendectomy, Gomes should get a chance to put up numbers similar to what he did last season. Jefferson was playing some solid ball in the first three games and his minutes were slowly climbing from 22 to 28 to 30. He was on the verge of having some value, but now that should be transferred to Gomes, who certainly disappoint last night. It was probably one of the least remarkable triple-doubles in recent memory – 10/12/10 on 5-of-12 and 0-for-1 shooting with just 1 block to add – but it was a triple-double nonetheless. Gomes saw 38 minutes last night (thanks for those five extras, overtime), but 33 minutes sounds about right for as long as Jefferson is out. Expect Kenny Thomas-type numbers – solid points, boards and percentages. And speaking of Thomas, there’s another situation where two borderline guys – Thomas and Shareef Abdur-Rahim – become instantly start-worthy with the absence of Brad Miller. (Remember when I said I had an ominous feeling about Brad Miller right before the season started? Don’t say I didn’t warn you.)

None to Ton
There wasn’t much reason for Alonzo Mourning to be on any roster at the beginning of the season, unless you play in an especially deep league. He played 26 total minutes in the season’s first two games and has always been a 15-20 minute player when coming off the bench. But once Shaquille O’Neal went down with a bruised knee, he became a no-brainer pickup. This could be one of those classic “day-to-day” injuries that ends up lingering for a while. O’Neal also went down after two games last year – it was a more definitive injury that time – and Mourning stepped in to start the next 19 contests, in which he blocked a staggering 74 shots. His first start this year was a 15-minute clunker, but Tuesday against Seattle was what should more normal when he starts. He put up 13 and 6 with 4 blocks on 5-of-7 and 3-of-6 shooting, a very typical outing for Mourning in 30 minutes. He’s going to hurt you at the line, but he should be absolutely dominant in blocks. But when Shaq comes back, ‘Zo will go back to being a player without much value at all.

Rich Get Richer
A day after being named the #1 Guy Back With a Vengeance by the Sports Guy, Kenyon Martin is going right back to the operating table for surgery on his other knee. No word yet on how long he’ll be out, but don’t expect Martin back any time soon. And now that he has two bad knees, it’s certainly possible that we’ve seen the best of Martin. Which wasn’t even that great to begin with. Good thing for Nuggets fans he’s not locked in for four more seasons at the league maximum. Oh, shit. In any case, it’s hard to see a single beneficiary in this situation. The Nuggets have a deep frontcourt – of admittedly fragile players – so they can handle a single loss up front better than most teams, and they’ll probably spread the extra minutes out. Eduardo Najera got the start last night and played 25 minutes, Nene played 19 and Joe Smith even got off the bench and played 15 minutes. If those numbers hold, it won’t be good for anyone. Fantasy owners might like to see Nene get a shot, since Najera’s never been a fantasy factor and Smith is over the hill. But Nene is still working his way back into shape and might not be ready for the increased role. Even if he is, George Karl might want to stick with the veteran Najera, for whatever those reasons are that coaches like to stick with veterans at the expense of possible fantasy contributors.

Unless Nene somehow works his way into 30+ minutes per game – and let’s be honest, it’s been since the end of 2004 since he’s really been any good – there’s production to be filled and it won’t be filled by the replacements. Where will it go? In cases like this, it often goes to the top and last night was only one game, but that’s what happened. Carmelo Anthony simply took on a bigger role, going for 37/6/8 while attempting 26 shots and 18 free throws in 40 minutes. The top players almost always get a least a trickle down when injuries hit anyway. In Dallas, Jerry Stackhouse looks to be taking Josh Howard’s starting role over the next couple weeks and should have a bit of value, but look for more games such as last night’s where Dirk Nowitzki and Jason Terry were clearly the top options. And man, that Dallas/Phoenix game tonight is going to be a couple of desperate teams, huh?

01
November 9th, 2006 11:02 am

what do you guys think about Al Harrington? He’s been doing great last 3 games after being almost non-existent the 1st 2 games. Will he keep this up?

02
rich
November 9th, 2006 11:40 am

Curious what you guys think of a trade I could do n h2h. I was offered Mike Miller and Felton for Nelson and Randolph - I have no problems shipping away Nelson with Arroyo there, and I’m not too worried about losing Randolph, as I think even without him, I’ll be quite competitive in boards (Miller contributes 5-6 a game himself!), whereas I’ll be greatly padding my dominance in 3s/assists/steals. Even though it’s h2h, I’ll show off my roster if I had to play my absolute best line-up.

PG: Kidd
SG: Q. Richardson
G: Nelson
SF: Jamison
PF: Garnett
F: Kirilenko
C: Mohammed, Dalembert
Util: Knight, Randolph
Bench: Jack, Bynum, D. Williams

I feel like without Randolph, I still have more than enough bigs who are capable rebounders (KG, AK47, Jamison, Mohammed, Dalembert, maybe even Bynum). Felton strikes me as a much better play than Jameer Nelson, who seems to be losing more and more time to Arroyo by the game. Mike Miller will give me a ton of 3s, and with his SG/SF eligibility, goes well with Q. Rich for giving me 3s on command.

Also, I was wondering about your opinions on Shaun Livingston - there’s two stats catching my eye… the fact he’s averaging 1.2 steals a game and 1.6 blocks a game. Those blocks especially… out of a PG slot? Man. While I don’t expect 1.6 a game, anyone think he’ll be able to maintain 1 BPG? He is 6′7 after all, though he hasn’t done it in the past. Watching him on TV though, the guy looks amazing on defense. The possibility of adding a shot blocker who could give me 5 assists and possibly a 3 a game is quite tempting…

03
DM
November 9th, 2006 12:20 pm

Al Harrington’s a good dude to have around. He is what he is, and that’s not a superstar, but he should be good for 17-18 ppg, decent boards, decent shooting, handful of steals or blocks. He might even get some center eligibility, you never know.

Felton’s a good buy-low candidate right now, and we had him ranked slightly higher than Nelson coming into the year. His injury last night seems minor, but you know how that can go. He’s gonna kill your FG%, just know that. But if (when?) Brevin Knight goes down, he should put up some monster numbers.

There’s a lot to like with Livingston, especially if he keeps getting his 30mpg off the bench. I’m still skeptical of bench players, because they are far more likely to have a night where they do nothing in 15 minutes, but Livingston can help out enough in assists, steals and blocks that he’s worth looking at in most leagues.

04
Jeremy
November 9th, 2006 3:43 pm

Hey everyone, I just want to let you all know that I really do appreciate the input that you all have been giving me. I’m just trying to setup my team to be good for the long run, and grab some steals of players for long term.

I just made one trade, and I’m looking into another. Here is my current team:

Deron Williams
Mike Bibby
Luol Deng
Darko Milicic
Lebron James
Chris Kaman
Nenad Krstic
Marcus Camby
Andre Miller
Kevin Martin
Paul Pierce
Joe Johnson
Andrew Bynum
David West
Jameer Nelson

Here is the other guy’s current team:

Chris Paul
Jason Richardson
Raymond Felton
Bobby Jackson
Elton Brand
Richard Jefferson
Andres Nocioni
Delonte West
David Lee
Tracy McGrady
Jeff Foster
Earl Watson
Tony Parker
Eddie Jones
Andris Biedrins

It looks like McGrady is starting to heat up, so I don’t know how much value I can provide. I also like Felton as a buy-low candidate. What combination of players would you suggest sending to him for perhaps McGrady and/or Felton.

At first I was going to send Kaman and Deng for McGrady and West, but I’d like to see if I can upgrade and get Felton out of the deal as well. Any suggestions as to whom I could send out with Kaman?

I think that losing Kaman would put me at risk at center, with my other guys being Bynum, Milicic and Krstic that would be left to start. But at the same time, if McGrady is even a shadow of what he was two years ago, then he’ll help me really tear it up. This is a 12-cat H2H if you’re interested.

Thanks for the input. He’s weak in centers and I’d like to make this happen!

05
DM
November 9th, 2006 5:21 pm

Maybe you can pull a fast one on this dude, but if I’m the guy with McGrady, I better be getting LBJ, Pierce or Joe Johnson back in any deal that sends McGrady out. That’s the bottom line there. The difference between solid players like Kaman and Deng and superstars like McGrady is substantial. Kaman will get better but he’s been absolutely brutal so far. Don’t expect to get too much for him.

06
Jeremy
November 9th, 2006 6:47 pm

No kidding. 10 minutes in a game doesn’t really help. I doubt I’ll be able to pull McGrady since he’s showing signs of life, but I might be able to grab Felton..maybe, I’m working on it.

07
ray
November 9th, 2006 7:21 pm

Hey guys, I’m doing pretty well in my leagues except for one big mistake.

I drafted Andres Nocioni in all my leagues around the 5th/6th round. I picked him up last year after the all star break when he was getting around 15 pt/10 reb and 1.5 3’s, so I was expecting big things this year too. I’ve been watching a lot of bulls games and am beginning to panic a bit. The amount of depth on the team along with scott skiles only leads me to believe that I should cut my losses now.

But when I look at who’s available through trades I don’t think I can even get an 8th round guy for him. Should I stick onto him and try to trade him after he has a big game and what type of a player should I target? I need C’s but I don’t think I can get someone like Chandler or Dalembert for him. Any suggestions?

08
ray
November 9th, 2006 7:23 pm

Also, I’ve been trying a lot of package deals and throwing nocioni in there, but it seems like he has no value in those trades for the other person.

09
Terrance
November 9th, 2006 7:50 pm

yeah, he has no value right now. youd have to trade him when hes hot. but if yr looking for C that you might get, someone like krstic, wilcox, mohammed. and i think those are big mights with the way nocionis been playing. you may be better off doing what you were saying…waiting for him to have a big week then shipping him off.

10
rich
November 9th, 2006 8:56 pm

Anyone think Marbury is going to rebound soon? He’s been playing so terrible that I’m almost tempted to start trading for him.. he can’t be this bad can he?

11
Terrance
November 9th, 2006 9:16 pm

claxton vs watson?

who has more value right now?

i dont expect claxton to continue play this bad, as he is still hurt. but watson has a very productive 25 min/game. i personally think its a toss up.

id rather have claxton for the long haul, his injury history is suspect though. meanwhile, watson is good for: one moneyball, 10 pts, 5 assists and a steal a game. very good #s for a 3-4 pg.

wasnt claxton supposed to be worth a 2nd PG spot this season? wasnt jameer nelson supposed to be a sure shot? wasnt battier supposed to put up solid #s? lots of sleepers are still napping, hopefully they wake up soon. i will say this, the guys here at FBB called ben wallace being a flop this season…at least so far.

12
DM
November 9th, 2006 9:30 pm

Unless you’re in an extremely deep league, there’s no way anyone will want to trade for Nocioni right now, especially when he’s the third person in a 2-for-1 deal. People hate those deals, it feels like you’re trying to get them to take your garbage. Honestly, I think you’ll have trouble trading Nocioni at all, he just doesn’t have lots of name, trade value.

As for Marbury, he’s on my team and I’ve been watching as often as I can subject myself to the Knicks, and it’s not pretty. It’s not that he looks particularly bad, it’s just that the Knicks offense just doesn’t seem to have any flow. Honestly, at this point I’m hoping he can average 15/6 for the season and maybe start shooting more 3s. I’m not feeling very good.

Claxton should be fine, it’s just about making sure he gets healthy and then gets the opportunity to start and play 30+ minutes. I wouldn’t say either of those are imminent. I think he will definitely have some value at some point this season, but it might not be all that soon. Watson’s sorta like Earl Boykins, in that they make the most of their minutes, it’s just that there just aren’t quite enough of them.

Also, it’s been five games for most people. Still so incredibly, ridiculously early.

13
ray
November 9th, 2006 11:10 pm

Thanks for the replies. Yeah I think I just have to ride Nocioni out a little bit longer. But, if this continues do you guys think I just have to drop him after a month?

14
MIKE
November 10th, 2006 10:05 am

What are peoples thoughts on Zach Randolph - I could get Troy Murphy and Tony Parker for him. It seems like pretty good value, but I do have a lot of PGs, and Zach has been a beast!

15
Jeremy
November 10th, 2006 11:22 am

I hate those 2 on 1 trades because you have to end up dropping someone. Zach has apparently slimmed down and he is the Man in Portland. In GS you have a bunch of other players who will get the ball, and TP is 3rd in the pecking order in San Antonio. I know that Randolph is playing really well right now, but I wouldn’t be doing that trade anytime soon, or at all.

Hope this helps.

16
Rich
November 10th, 2006 3:21 pm

What do you guys think about Randy Foye? He’s in FA in a league I’m in, and I’ve noticed his minutes have been increasing slightly. Though he most likely got his 22 minutes tlast game hanks to foul trouble, he still did put up fairly nice numbers (he was attempting 3s too). Are there any wolves fans who have watched him play and could report on how he’s looked?

17
Terrance
November 10th, 2006 5:08 pm

Mike, id personally take that trade. but i hate randolphs game quite a bit, i say sell high. murphy is double double material and tony parker is what he is, a high FG% poor FT% PG who can score and is always healthy. id get rid of zach asap.

jeremy, i do agree that those 2-1 trade are usually a sham and someone is trying to pin some junk on you, but i dont think thats the case here. id almost take parker over randolph straight up and then you get murphy on top of that is great!

id say parker is the #2 option in san antonio and was last year too. hes getting more shots than duncan this season and only one less than duncan last season. ginobli takes 5 less shots a game. if you need Fg% help, theres few others who can help you more than parker. although, he cant shoot a FT, maybe if he could tear drop it from the line that would help :) . i like parker quit a bit, maybe more than i should, he does more than randolph, imo.

bobby simmons or danny granger? simmons injury concerns me because its a heel injury and even when healthy those can still flare, should i avoid him or does he have more upside than granger? thank you

18
jimmyjames
November 11th, 2006 11:22 am

i hate those guys like randolph who keep putting up 30-35 and 10-12. this is his line, so far, this week:
fg.544 ft-.907 3pt- 1 pts- 102 rebs- 35 ast- 4 stls- 6 block- 3 to’s–8

not too shabby. and watch troy murphy’s minutes be incosistent this year i would think.

19
Demetri
November 22nd, 2006 9:22 am

I have shaun livingston, and speedy claxton is available on waivers. do i drop livingston for claxton ?? what do you think ?

Leave Your Comment

Name*
Mail*
Website
Comment