<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New!  Updated!  Top 20!</title>
	<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/</link>
	<description>A Fantasy Basketball Blog. Surprise.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: MIKE</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1544</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1544</guid>
					<description>Thanks BV, I hopped on it.  I'll miss the days of 14 for 15 from the line every night, but Boozer is solid and provides better overall peripherals.  And he's not a thug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks BV, I hopped on it.  I&#8217;ll miss the days of 14 for 15 from the line every night, but Boozer is solid and provides better overall peripherals.  And he&#8217;s not a thug.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: bv</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1534</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1534</guid>
					<description>mike, i'd trade randolph for boozer in a heart-beat.  randolph may be playing well now but he is quite frankly not to be trusted.   Pull that switch fast before your league-mate thinks better of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mike, i&#8217;d trade randolph for boozer in a heart-beat.  randolph may be playing well now but he is quite frankly not to be trusted.   Pull that switch fast before your league-mate thinks better of it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MIKE</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1533</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1533</guid>
					<description>So you would rank Zach Randolph over Carlos Boozer??  Boozer is center-eligible in my league; I was just offered that one for one swap.

Thoughts??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you would rank Zach Randolph over Carlos Boozer??  Boozer is center-eligible in my league; I was just offered that one for one swap.</p>
<p>Thoughts??
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1532</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 06:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1532</guid>
					<description>How many other people are really, REALLY pissed right now that they took Chris Kaman instead of Emeka Okafor?

Okafor has been last-year's Camby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many other people are really, REALLY pissed right now that they took Chris Kaman instead of Emeka Okafor?</p>
<p>Okafor has been last-year&#8217;s Camby.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1527</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1527</guid>
					<description>Warrick will certainly lose value once Pau Pasol comes back, and Rudy Gay/Stomile Swift will eat into his time as well. 

Portland has a lot of injured bigs in Pryzbilla, Magloire and LaFrentz. I see Pryzbilla getting time when he's healthy because Portland spent quite a bit to resign him recently. Maglore is an idiot playing like he is in a contract year. 

Portland is certainly building with their youth (think Chicago three years ago) and thus it wouldn't suprise me to see if they continue to throw Alderage out there more and more, especially if he produces like he did in his first game back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warrick will certainly lose value once Pau Pasol comes back, and Rudy Gay/Stomile Swift will eat into his time as well. </p>
<p>Portland has a lot of injured bigs in Pryzbilla, Magloire and LaFrentz. I see Pryzbilla getting time when he&#8217;s healthy because Portland spent quite a bit to resign him recently. Maglore is an idiot playing like he is in a contract year. </p>
<p>Portland is certainly building with their youth (think Chicago three years ago) and thus it wouldn&#8217;t suprise me to see if they continue to throw Alderage out there more and more, especially if he produces like he did in his first game back.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: arpit</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1526</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1526</guid>
					<description>how long do you think roy will be out if he has surgery. will he produce when he comes back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how long do you think roy will be out if he has surgery. will he produce when he comes back.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: arpit</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1525</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1525</guid>
					<description>thanks, wat about aldridge, i picked him up over warrick. good move? i think so, i like wat aldridge has to offer. he played in crunch time last game. portland doesn't have good big men besides randolf. He should be starting soon and producing like 12 and 11 with like 3 offensive rebounds. maybe a block or two, good %s. low to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, wat about aldridge, i picked him up over warrick. good move? i think so, i like wat aldridge has to offer. he played in crunch time last game. portland doesn&#8217;t have good big men besides randolf. He should be starting soon and producing like 12 and 11 with like 3 offensive rebounds. maybe a block or two, good %s. low to.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DM</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1524</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 21:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1524</guid>
					<description>I don't think Fred Jones is going to be all that valuable. He's already playing 29 mpg, I don't think he'll get TOO much more. He'll get some 3s, but he's your typical low FG% swingman who doesn't really help unless he's getting big minutes as the featured offensive weapon (like he did in a few post-brawl games).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Fred Jones is going to be all that valuable. He&#8217;s already playing 29 mpg, I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll get TOO much more. He&#8217;ll get some 3s, but he&#8217;s your typical low FG% swingman who doesn&#8217;t really help unless he&#8217;s getting big minutes as the featured offensive weapon (like he did in a few post-brawl games).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: arpit</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1523</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1523</guid>
					<description>what will fred jones average. will he get anything other than points.

Does this mean that tj ford will get more assists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what will fred jones average. will he get anything other than points.</p>
<p>Does this mean that tj ford will get more assists.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1522</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2006/11/14/new-updated-top-20-10/#comment-1522</guid>
					<description>MIN,
I'd also drop collison (rather than Nazr) for Perkins.

I'm intrigued by Perkins, and considering dropping Darko for him, but can't decide. Seems like Darko's play has been improving recently.

Also considering dropping Darko for Channing Frye.. Though Frye's upside for blocks isn't great.

I'm also hesitant go pick up Knicks and Celtics due to their team/coaching situations...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MIN,<br />
I&#8217;d also drop collison (rather than Nazr) for Perkins.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m intrigued by Perkins, and considering dropping Darko for him, but can&#8217;t decide. Seems like Darko&#8217;s play has been improving recently.</p>
<p>Also considering dropping Darko for Channing Frye.. Though Frye&#8217;s upside for blocks isn&#8217;t great.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also hesitant go pick up Knicks and Celtics due to their team/coaching situations&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
