Why I Picked Up Marcus Banks

OK, so here’s what happened.  Yesterday morning, when I read that Steve Nash missed the last half of the game Tuesday against the Suns with shoulder discomfort, I picked up Marcus Banks.  Let’s go through the quick hits here:  1.  No, I’m not a complete moron.  2.  Yes, I know who Marcus Banks is and I’ve seen his FG%.  3. No, I’m not trying to tank the season so that I can draft Greg Oden next year.  That’s not even how our league works!
 
Anyhow, last week I talked about pre-emptive strikes and this is a pre-emptive strike right here.  Not only the move, but this column is actually a pre-emptive strike to DM, who kindly wrote to say, “marcus banks? really? really?? man, that’s gonna be a fun TR to right on thursday night!”  Let’s take a look at the two biggest factors that led me to make this move because it can shed some light on some bigger trends going on right now in the league, and because DM is a smelly pirate hooker.
 
Factor Number One: Returning stars aren’t always a good thing.
Now, my team hasn’t been spectacular this year but I’m coasting along in 2nd place thanks to a couple of over-achievers and a couple of fill-ins like Rasual Butler and Charlie Bell.  Well, a funny thing is happening to the Rasual Butlers and Charlie Bells of the world - they’re losing their value through no fault of their own.  Butler was a fine fantasy player while the Hornets struggled with injuries, putting up almost 15 ppg with 2 threes and nearly a steal and a block, but now that David West and Chris Paul are back, he’s down to 20 mpg in February and is back in fantasy irrelevance.  Same deal - sorta - with Bell, who wasn’t all that much better without Michael Redd and Mo Williams in the lineup but still should be heading back to the waiver wires now that Williams is back and Redd is close.
 
But the thing is, now that these stars are coming back, the ripple effect is going to be felt hard on the waiver wires.  As guys like Paul, Redd, Rashard Lewis, and Paul Pierce work their way back into the lineup, it means that guys like Gerald Green, David West, Rasual Butler, and all the other patch-up players are going to lose their value and owner will be looking to replace them.  Even guys like Kwame Brown returning will have some significance in the fantasy world because Andrew Bynum will lose a lot of his value.  All I’m saying is, the waiver wire is going to be a lot tougher to navigate over the next few weeks.  And for those of us who have been doing a little patchwork to cover holes in our teams, those holes might be a little more exposed than we’d like them unless we act fast.

Factor Number Two: The Garbage Spot comes into play
Way back in November I blabbed for awhile about how to man your bench and, more specifically, the concept of the “garbage spot,” where you can pick up and drop players who might not necessarily have any real value but could in a couple of things if everything goes right.  You know who I dropped for Banks?  Jason Williams.  I’d picked him up a few weeks ago and he actually gave me a couple of decent games back in Mid-January.  But now he’s hurt, Eddie Jones and Gary Payton are back, and  when you think about it, who’s going to have more value over the next week, WIlliams or Banks? 

Even if Banks hardly does anything, he is a prime example of a garbage spot guy.  I’m giving up practically nothing to get him, and I’m relying on him for absolutely nothing, but IF Nash is out for a significant amount of time, and IF Banks is a de-facto 30 mpg replacement, he could be a significant pickup for my squad over the nex couple of weeks.  Keep in mind, as well, that the Suns are looking to deal Banks and could use this opportunity to showcase him.  Basically what I’m saying is this - I know there is no more than maybe a 15% chance that Banks has any value over the next week.  But so what?  I didn’t give up any value to acquire him, and odds are I’ll drop him in a few days once Nash is back and never think of him again.  But if - however unlikely it may be - Banks turns into something valuable over the next few weeks, maybe I’ll write another column bragging about it.

01
Matt
February 7th, 2007 6:52 am

Two questions:

1) Why would David West lose value? You said that with him and Paul back, Butler will lose value. Perhaps you meant Delonte West?

2) I just made that deal where I sent Garnett and Turk for McGrady and Amare. Do you think it’s a good move to deal McGrady (for perhaps Odom or Hinrich, or Ben Gordon…I’ve offered him for Vince and Kidd but I imagine those will be rejected) or do you think McGrady will keep this up without getting injured? He has played in the majority of his games this year.

Let me know what ya’ think.

02
Matt
February 7th, 2007 6:56 am

Also,

I agree that it doesn’t hurt to have a garbage spot, but if you can fill it with a legitimate player (my garbage spot is going to Millsap right now) then why wouldn’t you?

03
bv
February 7th, 2007 7:15 am

matt, yep, i absolutely meant delonte west. as for your trade, well, it seems like a trade you would make if you team is struggling, sending a sure thing (KG) for two risks (TMac and Amare). I would definitely see what’s out there for McGrady but don’e sell yourself short, gordon or hinrich are probably too low in value for what you want.

04
Matt
February 7th, 2007 8:30 am

Hey bv,

You’ll be a bit disappointed, but I just got Gordon for McGrady. Taking two injury risks with T-Mac and Amare was too much for me to handle. So I grabbed Gordon, who really is a poor man’s Joe Johnson - which isn’t all bad. His health will allow me to make up for the rebounding and assist differential that was created by trading Garnett. Also, I read your advice too late - I would have pulled the offer off the table, but the guy accepted it before I could. All in all though, with the way Amare is playing, along with the fact that he appears to be gathering steam as the season continues, I’m thinking that it will work out. Also, my points lead is safe - as the guy who I traded Garnett to was 2nd behind me in points - and he just gave up close to 40 ppg and only got about 32 ppg in return.

05
CBass
February 7th, 2007 8:33 am

Odom is closer to McGrady’s value, but still below. As for Hinrich or Gordon, cmon man…Where was Ben Gordon drafted in your league? And McGrady? Those 2 shouldn’t even be mentioned in the same breath. McGrady is consistent, and Ben Gordon’s mug is int eh dictionary under ‘inconsistent’. And Hinrich is a solid #2 point guard while McGrady is a top 5 forward.

06
CBass
February 7th, 2007 8:34 am

Are hinrich and Bibby too much to give up for Nash right now?

07
Matt
February 7th, 2007 8:36 am

The risk of T-Mac getting injured is too high (and too inevitable).

08
Matt
February 7th, 2007 8:37 am

Also,

You Hinrich and Bibby are only too much depending on how long Nash is out for.

09
CBass
February 7th, 2007 8:40 am

Matt,

TMac is a big name. He puts up huge numbers. Find a star-struck owner in your league who sees the numbers he’s putting up right now and deal him for a star if you’re worried about his health. Don’t settle for a Gordon or a Hinrich.

10
Matt
February 7th, 2007 8:57 am

There are no star struck owners in my league. This is the problem. Everyone has a pretty good handle on value (although it’s possible I’m overestimating them).

11
CBass
February 7th, 2007 9:03 am

Matt,

Just read that you already pulled the trigger. You should probably ask for advice BEFORE you make trades rather than afterwards. In my league, Gordon went in Rd 8, pick 95. McGrady? Rd one, pick 11. McGrady averages 42 fantasy points per week in my standard league, Gordon averages a barely startable 29. Many players are injury risks, but you just can’t take such a hit in production because you’re worried about injuries. I live in Houston, and last night McGrady put up something like 31/8/7 on a quiet, average night. Gordon put up 11/2/2 with 3 TOs on Monday! I’m just sayin…

12
Matt
February 7th, 2007 10:23 am

31/8/7 is not a quiet night. Admittedly, the guys is a beast. But I was surprised the other day to not see T-Mac getting injured in the Stone-Cold Locks column.

Also, as I said, I didn’t think the guy would accept that fast. I thought I’d get the advice first. Anyhow, it upped me in areas where I need to move up (FT%, PTS, 3PTS) and kept my rebounds and assists close to constant (in 1st in REB and 2nd in AST) without taking on greater injury risk - which I already took on with Amare.
So, I’m feeling good and, sorry to say CBASS from Houston, hoping T-Mac gets injured.

Later dude.

13
DM
February 7th, 2007 11:22 am

did i really type “right” instead of “write”? i don’t even think i was (too) drunk when i typed that!

14
OB
February 7th, 2007 12:37 pm

Although Gordon for T-Mac is not a fair trade, gordon has been playing a lot better this year and with more consistency than last year. And when yao is close to returning, maybe T-Mac will go away for rest again…

But the fact that the trade got accepted right away, shows you that you could probably have got more for T-Mac. Maybe Gordon and some other player who will play big in second half…but its too late…

I am in a deep league, I am just wondering if I should hang onto richard jefferson or not???

15
MIKE
February 7th, 2007 1:31 pm

Off topic– how great is Brandon Roy ? — wonder where he’ll great drafted next year. Looks like he could be a Star.

16
February 7th, 2007 3:20 pm

I like Brandon Roy. He looks to be emerging as Portland’s definitive #2, sometimes #1 option as Roy is evolving into a star player. He has great FT% is taking freaking 9.7 FT @ 86.2% in 3 February games, low TOs, scoring 20+ ppg, gets a decent amount of steals…with the way Roy’s been improving it’s hard to place your finger on where he’s going to settle and when you can expect certain type of #s, but it looks like Roy can easily be a 18/5/4 on 45/85, a 3PT a game with ~1.5 steals and 1.5 TOs.

I’d say those type of overall numbers might land Roy as a 4th/5th round value, although I might be off since it’s my first year playing fantasy.

17
JM
February 7th, 2007 4:55 pm

JagoJago,
I agree with your assessment on Roy. I’ve been to a bunch of Blazers games in person this year, and watch most of the others on TV.

Roy is the real deal. He’s certainly looking like a 4th/5th rounder for 9-cat fantasy leagues for years to come.

I see him in the tier of SGs a cut below the superstars, yet still worrth an early-to-mid round pick. Others in this tier: Ginobili, Terry, Deng, Iguodola, Hamilton.

One thing that I’d add is that Roy has been getting very little respect from the refs on his drives to the rim, i.e. For someone who plays as agressive as him and has such good head fakes he should be averaging 7-8 FT attempts/game. But since he’s apparently “paying his dues” as a rookie, he’s averaging 4.6 fT attempts/g for the season. I’m guessing that will increase next year. The fantasy implications are that his FG% will improve and the extra FT attempts will increase his already stellar value in FT%.

If the Blazers end up trading Zach this summer and becoming an up-tempo team (to take advantage of Aldridge,Rodriguez,Roy,etc.) Roy’s value could increase further…to maybe a 3rd rounder in 3-4 years…

18

[…] Pickup: Marcus Banks Drop: Jason Williams BV had his preemptive strike on this one back on Wednesday. Williams had a decent little run – and that’s all it was, a decent little run – and has fallen to injury again. If he gets healthy for a stretch run, don’t forget about him. […]

Leave Your Comment

Name*
Mail*
Website
Comment