Don’t Worry, You Can Trust Them

One of the toughest tasks at the beginning of the year is to know where to slot players coming off career-best seasons. Was that as good as it gets or did they establish a new norm? Today we’ll look at three players who were coming off surprisingly strong seasons last year, were probably passed over one time too many in your draft, and have proven this season that they shouldn’t be doubted moving forward.

Mehmet Okur
Lost in all the talk about Carlos Boozer’s all-star season and Deron Williams sophomore campaign breakout is the ascension of Mehmet Okur to Legitimate Fantasy Force. He ended last season at 33/42 on the player rater, but it was easy to get the sense that not many people took him all that seriously. He’s a center who doesn’t block that many shots and likes to shoot 3s, he’s got Jerry Sloan to deal with, he doesn’t have a long track record of success … if you looked hard enough you could find reasons to pass on taking him. Doubtful that will happen in the future. If you’ve been watching Jazz games lately you know that Okur has been given a new nickname – “Money.” And it’s entirely appropriate because he has become one of the most reliable clutch shooters around. I remember watching the Jazz play the Wizards back on MLK Day, when the Wizards were still a good team, and Okur and Gilbert Arenas just traded huge 3s back and forth in the final minutes. It basically came down to who had the ball last in that one. The other night Okur was questionable with the flu but toughed it out and came through with some huge hoops in the fourth quarter against the Knicks to force overtime in a game the Jazz eventually won. His touch from the outside is simply sensational, and it has led to him becoming more enamored with the outside shot. He attempted 3.7 3pg in November, 4.4 in December, 5.8 in January and is up to 6.3 in the first three games of February. A bit odd for a center, but his owners certainly don’t mind. He’s currently 15th in the league in made 3s, an amazing competitive advantage from a center that makes up for his lackluster 0.6 blocks. Okur has also ceded some of the work on the boards this year to Boozer and rookie Paul Millsap, but his overall line of 18.1/7.5/2.0 with 1.8 3s on 47/78 shooting is fantastic. It’s more or less identical to what he did last year – a few more 3s and a few less boards this time – and it puts him at 39/48 on the player rater, slightly off last year’s pace. Still, many folks thought last year was a career year and Okur has proven those people wrong. He’s a legit, clutch player who at 27 years old is in the midst of his prime and hasn’t missed a game in three seasons. He’s established himself as one of the top threats on a newly high-powered Jazz offense and should be looked at as a third/fourth round pick for the foreseeable future.

Tony Parker
Parker, like Okur, is another player who tends to fall in drafts because his skill set isn’t typical for the position he plays. We like our point guards to rack up the 3s and steals, and Parker simply doesn’t do that. But what he does do is score, and score efficiently. He is a legitimate anchor in FG% from the PG position, which is even rarer than Okur’s prowess from the outside. Parker is currently the 9th ranked player in FG% value. Every other player in the top 15 is a PF or C, except for Steve Nash. Besides Nash, the next highest PG in FG% is Dwyane Wade down at #35, with Jose Calderon the only other in the top 50. If you know this strength going in, it can really help you shape your team. He may never top last year’s 54.8%, but his 52.8% this year is close enough. Parker can simply get to the hoop and finish, and the presence of Tim Duncan means that he doesn’t have to do it 20 times a game. By keeping his attempts around 15 per game, his percentage stays higher. His actual shooting has also improved this year, as he is knocking down more jumpers and is shooting a career high 78% from the line. This is especially big, as it is the first year when he hasn’t had negative value in that category, which is clutch for a PG. So the steals and 3s – and assists, sort of – aren’t really there. Appreciate Parker for what he is, which is the 40th ranked player right now. He’s another incredibly durable guy in his prime who is clearly established at the top of his team’s hierarchy. Consider this year his established level of play.

Jason Terry
Somehow Terry is one of the most perennially underrated players around. It was somewhat understandable when he was toiling in obscurity in Atlanta, but you’d think things would have changed in Dallas. Not the case. Terry went 55th on average in ESPN drafts, slipped to 47 in my league, and even though he hasn’t been particularly impressive this year, there he is at #36 on the player rater. Unlike Terry’s first year in Dallas, his role is secure now. In 04-05 he saw just 30 mpg, and even though he managed to put up very impressive numbers, people were understandable skeptical about his ability to repeat that production with the same playing time. He’s now a consistent 35 mpg man, and what’s most impressive about Terry is how his game has transformed over the years. Back in Atlanta he was a classic best option on a bad team guy. He piled up the stats, but missed enough shots to be a real drag on your FG%. He’s at just 45.4% this season, but that’s still very acceptable for a PG/SG. Most importantly, it hasn’t meant fewer 3s, as he is hovering right around a pair of treys per game for the second consecutive season. That Terry’s numbers are so similar to last year’s is comforting. The assists are up, the scoring’s a bit down, and his once very nice steals are below average. But the Terry you see now is the Terry to expect in Dallas. If you see a trend here, it’s that of players establishing themselves as a top option on a reliable team. We love consistency and health here at FBB, and Terry, like the other two players featured today, gives that to you. With Dallas, you know that on most nights it will be Dirk Nowitzki, Josh Howard and Terry giving you the best lines in the box score. Terry is signed for the long haul in Dallas, and as long as he stays there, it’s time to start finally appreciating him.

01
Hoodlum
February 12th, 2007 8:50 am

Comlete non sequitor. What’s the read on Larry Hughes? I just took him off the wire. I love that he can get 3s, steals, and assists–all cats I’m competitive in, and need a boost to win (it’s an 8-cat roto league). Think he’ll rebound in the second half? Worth holding tight to?

02
DM
February 12th, 2007 10:48 am

It’s hard to be too enthused about Larry Hughes at this point, but if you can pluck a 6th or so round pick off the WW for free, may as well give it a shot. Just know that he will absolutely kill you in FG% and is merely decent in steals these days.

03
Rookie
February 12th, 2007 11:04 am

I discovered this website just a few weeks ago and find it really informative, especially given that it’s my first time playing fantasy basketball. What do you think of “breakout” players last season who aren’t living up to their hype?

For example, I drafted Diaw (3rd round) and Kaman (5th round) and am kicking myself for it. I want to move either or both of these guys for a big man that can help in rebounds and/or blocks. Kaman has been frustratingly inconsistent, so I’d prefer to get rid of him. All of my trade offers were rejected. I’m fluctuating between 2nd and 4th in my roto league.

Should I drop these guys, or ride it out and hope that they’ll improve? What do you think I could reasonably get in return in a trade for these guys?

04
swami
February 12th, 2007 12:20 pm

Diaw just showed up on my wire–along with Sam Cassell (and the aforementioned Hughes). How would you rank those three?

05
swami
February 12th, 2007 3:00 pm

Rookie, I was thinking about your dilemma some more. One of the things that seems really hard is to know, when do I drop a guy who’s pretty good (or has been in the past) but is underperforming? For example, Ricky Davis started off the year awful. I kept him for a couple of months, but he wasn’t really doing much. So I dropped him. Another guy picked him up, and over the last 15 days he’s like 34 on the player rater. This just kills me. At the same time, you’ve got to make a decision. With Diaw, the challenging thing is though he gets good boards, assists, and FG% (and a few blocks), he’s a goose egg with 3s and steals many nights. The way I’d assess that would be, how competitive are 3s and steals, versus the cats where he’s helping? Really though this becomes an issue of how balanced is your team. Does he throw it out of balance, and is there a guy on the wire who, if you dropped Diaw and picked up, would bring it more in balance–or help you gain points in the categories you need to win? The same goes for Kaman. I have Ilgauskas, who’s had terrible games–but I’ve been rotating in when I think he could have a good game, and he’s helping me. But it’s a dance. Anyway, if you’re somewhere b/t 2nd and 4th, sounds like you have a good team. Maybe you can make Kaman and Diaw role players for the rest of the year? I don’t really have any answers for you, but it’s a good question you pose.

06
Tommy
February 12th, 2007 9:21 pm

Should i pick up Marvin Williams or Livingston? I really need 3’s and FT%

Leave Your Comment

Name*
Mail*
Website
Comment