<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New! Updated! Top 20!</title>
	<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/</link>
	<description>A Fantasy Basketball Blog. Surprise.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Telmona</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29657</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29657</guid>
					<description>Chris Kaman !!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Kaman !!!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sarge</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29656</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29656</guid>
					<description>Dwight Howard, hands down, gets my nod at 20.

Baron should be in there over Redd as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dwight Howard, hands down, gets my nod at 20.</p>
<p>Baron should be in there over Redd as well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29543</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29543</guid>
					<description>Concerning turnovers, I usually factor them into my personal calculations, but there is a reason that we tend not to like them. Good players have the ball in their hand a lot, and as a result usually put up large turnover values. In H2H, I expect the best teams to probably be losing TOs most weeks unless their first few picks are all low-turnover guys like Shawn Marion. 


And as an Arenas owner, this hurts too. 3 Months makes it so very difficult to hang onto him, but like Brand he'll probably come back and in high value at the end of the season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning turnovers, I usually factor them into my personal calculations, but there is a reason that we tend not to like them. Good players have the ball in their hand a lot, and as a result usually put up large turnover values. In H2H, I expect the best teams to probably be losing TOs most weeks unless their first few picks are all low-turnover guys like Shawn Marion. </p>
<p>And as an Arenas owner, this hurts too. 3 Months makes it so very difficult to hang onto him, but like Brand he&#8217;ll probably come back and in high value at the end of the season.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: frank</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29540</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29540</guid>
					<description>Boozer
Baron Davis
Dwight Howard
Deron Williams</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boozer<br />
Baron Davis<br />
Dwight Howard<br />
Deron Williams
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29534</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29534</guid>
					<description>Arenas out for 3 months - looks like we need a 19th and a 20th now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arenas out for 3 months - looks like we need a 19th and a 20th now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nageek</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29527</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29527</guid>
					<description>how come you guys dont include turnovers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how come you guys dont include turnovers?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29479</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29479</guid>
					<description>I say Pierce or Boozer for #20.  Boozer's FT is only 5% above his career avg, so I don't think that will regress too much. I'd be slightly more concerned about the 0.8 blocks he's putting up which is not likely to last since it's more than double his average from last year, so I'd probably give the nod to Pierce, who is doing a bit of everything.

soopahpit: I keep hearing about D. Howard's "potential" improved FT shooting.  Sure, he has a couple of 13-for-16 games this year, but that is not making up for his 10-for-20 and 7-for-freakin'-16 games.  He's under 63% for the year on nearly 11 attempts per game.  That's fantasy poison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say Pierce or Boozer for #20.  Boozer&#8217;s FT is only 5% above his career avg, so I don&#8217;t think that will regress too much. I&#8217;d be slightly more concerned about the 0.8 blocks he&#8217;s putting up which is not likely to last since it&#8217;s more than double his average from last year, so I&#8217;d probably give the nod to Pierce, who is doing a bit of everything.</p>
<p>soopahpit: I keep hearing about D. Howard&#8217;s &#8220;potential&#8221; improved FT shooting.  Sure, he has a couple of 13-for-16 games this year, but that is not making up for his 10-for-20 and 7-for-freakin&#8217;-16 games.  He&#8217;s under 63% for the year on nearly 11 attempts per game.  That&#8217;s fantasy poison.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29471</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29471</guid>
					<description>Candidates for #20 in non-TO leagues:
Boozer
Pierce
Kaman
Billups
Kirilenko

Of those the ones with the best chance of sustaining top 20 production are: Billups and Pierce.
Boozer's FT% should regress
Kirilenko's Asts should regress
Kaman's pts,reb,FT% should regress

I suspect Pierce's FG% will hold steady unless Allen or Garnett get injured
Billups is doing nothing out of the ordinary, just his usual underrated top 20 stats.


In TO leagues, Josh Howard is definitely the one to add to your top 20.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Candidates for #20 in non-TO leagues:<br />
Boozer<br />
Pierce<br />
Kaman<br />
Billups<br />
Kirilenko</p>
<p>Of those the ones with the best chance of sustaining top 20 production are: Billups and Pierce.<br />
Boozer&#8217;s FT% should regress<br />
Kirilenko&#8217;s Asts should regress<br />
Kaman&#8217;s pts,reb,FT% should regress</p>
<p>I suspect Pierce&#8217;s FG% will hold steady unless Allen or Garnett get injured<br />
Billups is doing nothing out of the ordinary, just his usual underrated top 20 stats.</p>
<p>In TO leagues, Josh Howard is definitely the one to add to your top 20.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: soopahpit</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29470</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29470</guid>
					<description>Dwight howard, with the potential increase in FT% his numbers combined make him pretty sick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dwight howard, with the potential increase in FT% his numbers combined make him pretty sick.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: nightkid</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29467</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fantasybasketblog.net/2007/11/21/new-updated-top-20-15/#comment-29467</guid>
					<description>Gasol, who many had picked in the first-seocnd round in their drafts, has been a big disappointment. Any views on whether he'll bounce back to become a force once again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gasol, who many had picked in the first-seocnd round in their drafts, has been a big disappointment. Any views on whether he&#8217;ll bounce back to become a force once again?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
